XiP vs NXD200 comparison

How the specs of XiP and NXD200 differ (both use Lubricant Sublayer Photo-curing).

日本語

Key differences

  • NXD200 has the larger build size (printable volume), about 1.8x that of XiP (XiP: 190 × 120 × 210 mm, NXD200: 275 × 155 × 200 mm).

Summarized automatically from listed data. Prices are reference prices in US dollars at the time of listing and are not converted from other currencies. Which one suits you depends on the size of what you want to print, your use and your budget.

Spec comparison table

Values differ
SpecXiPNXD200
ManufacturerNexa3DNexa3D
Printing methodLubricant Sublayer Photo-curingLubricant Sublayer Photo-curing
PricePrice not listedPrice not listed
Printer dimensions (values differ)420 × 350 × 530mm710 × 710 × 1675mm
Build area (values differ)190 × 120 × 210mm275 × 155 × 200mm
Weight (values differ)Not listed160kg
Resolution (XY) (values differ)52μm76.5μm
Resolution (Z)Not listedNot listed
Layer height (values differ)0.05 ~ 0.2mmNot listed
Print speedNot listedNot listed
Max nozzle temperatureNot listedNot listed
Max build plate temperatureNot listedNot listed
Max chamber temperatureNot listedNot listed
Nozzle sizeNot listedNot listed
Filament diameterNot listedNot listed
Light wavelengthNot listedNot listed
Power supply (values differ)100-240VAC, 50/60HzNA Version: 100-120 VAC, 50/60 Hz, Single Phase, 8A (NEMA 15-5R) / EU Version: 210-230 VAC, 50/60 Hz, Single Phase, 4A (CEE 7/7)
AvailabilityDiscontinuedDiscontinued
DetailsView specsView specs